We're a headhunter agency that connects US businesses with elite LATAM professionals who integrate seamlessly as remote team members — aligned to US time zones, cutting overhead by 70%.

We’ll match you with Latin American superstars who work your hours. Quality talent, no time zone troubles. Starting at $9/hour.
Contact UsOutsourced CFO, fractional CFO, part-time CFO and virtual CFO are used interchangeably by most providers, and the differences that matter are not the labels. They are three concrete things: how many hours a week you get, whether the person is yours or shared, and what it costs per hour once you convert the retainer. This guide answers those three, using what six providers publish on their own sites as of September 2026, and then compares the arrangement against hiring a dedicated finance lead, which is the option that never appears in these comparisons.
The scope is strategic rather than operational, and that line is where most disappointment comes from. The work starts, almost always, with forecasting and cash management, runway, scenarios, working capital, and grows into board and investor reporting: the package, the narrative, and the questions that follow it. Fundraising support sits alongside, though the model, data room and diligence are frequently billed as a project on top of the retainer. Pricing and unit economics come next, and systems work, choosing the stack, designing the close, usually closes the list.
What it does not include, at almost every provider: bookkeeping, the month-end close itself, payroll and tax. Those are separate lines with separate prices, and a CFO retainer sitting on top of an expensive bookkeeping bill is not a cheap arrangement.
Four labels, one product, and no provider in this audit defines them the same way.
The labels are not standardised and no provider in this audit defines them the same way. Two questions cut through all of it: how many hours, and is the person dedicated to us.
The trade is hours against availability: a retainer buys 5 to 23 hours a week at a fraction of a loaded US salary, and a full-time hire buys someone in the room.
The case for in-house is strongest when the finance function is a competitive lever and the company can carry the cost. The case for fractional is strongest when the need is senior judgment on a weekly rhythm, not daily presence.
This is the comparison the category leaves out, and for a mid-market company it is usually the real decision.
Neither is better in the abstract. The honest split: if what you are buying is a name for the board and a set of investor relationships, the firm is worth the premium. If what you are buying is someone to own the numbers, the dedicated hire gives you more of it.
The full rate breakdown is in outsourced CFO rates in 2026.
Six providers audited in September 2026. One publishes its own rate; the other five publish a market range and do not say where they sit inside it.
Of six outsourced CFO providers audited in September 2026, one publishes its own rate. The other five publish the market's range.
Four signals, and any one of them means changing the structure rather than the provider. The first is that the questions turn daily: a retainer priced for a weekly rhythm gets expensive fast when the team needs answers between sessions. The second is that nobody owns the close, a fractional CFO reviews the numbers and rarely produces them, so without a controller or senior accountant underneath, the reporting stalls.
The third is arithmetic: above roughly $7,500 a month, a dedicated hire usually delivers more hours for the same money. And the fourth is that the work turns operational. Systems implementations, multi-entity consolidations and audit prep are execution, and execution is exactly what a retainer rations.
Most disappointment with a fractional CFO is a staffing problem one level down: strategy arrives and nobody produces the numbers it needs.
Every retainer is a markup on someone's compensation, so the salary is what tells you whether the markup is reasonable.
Five questions, in this order. The first two eliminate most of the shortlist on their own.
Three structures, and they are not interchangeable: each one puts the tax and employment risk in a different place.
The classification test is in the IRS guidance on contractor versus employee status.
The underlying decision is the same one the rest of this site answers: whether to hire Latin American talent, and what it costs once you do.
A senior finance professional who works for your company part time, supplied by a firm or a marketplace, usually on a monthly retainer with a fixed number of hours per week. The scope is strategic, forecasting, board reporting, fundraising, unit economics, and typically excludes bookkeeping and the close.
Published market ranges are $3,000 to $15,000 a month and $100 to $450 an hour. The one provider publishing its own live data shows $178 an hour on average and about $16,200 a month at 23 hours a week.
In practice, very little, most providers use the terms interchangeably. Where a distinction exists, fractional means one named executive with a fixed weekly commitment to you, and outsourced can mean a firm assigning from a bench. Ask which one you are buying.
Yes, in almost every provider's usage. Part-time frames it by schedule and fractional frames it by model, but the product is the same: a senior finance lead for a set number of hours a week. The question that separates real options is how many hours, not which word.
In-house when finance is a competitive lever and the company can carry a full loaded salary. Outsourced when you need senior judgment on a weekly rhythm rather than daily presence. The middle case, you need ownership but not a US executive salary, is where a dedicated nearshore finance lead fits, and it rarely appears in this comparison.
Published commitments run from about 5 to 23 hours a week. Anything advertised without a number of hours is not a priced offer yet.
Almost never. Bookkeeping, the month-end close, payroll and tax are separate lines at nearly every provider. Ask for the full stack quote rather than the CFO line alone.
When the questions become daily, when nobody below them produces the numbers, when the work turns operational, or when the monthly spend passes what a dedicated hire would cost. Any of those four is the signal to change the structure rather than the provider.
Yes. A fractional or part-time finance lead in Latin America works US business hours with a zero to two hour difference, at a monthly all-in cost rather than a US hourly rate. The trade-off is that you are buying an individual's track record rather than a firm's brand.
Five things: a stated number of hours per week, a named person, monthly reporting and forecasting, a standing meeting, and what happens when work falls outside scope. If any is missing from the proposal, it is not priced yet.
Days to a few weeks, which is the clearest advantage over an in-house search measured in months. A dedicated nearshore hire sits in between: published times to hire run 16 to 21 days.
The provider, in a firm model. Nobody, in a marketplace model where the person is an independent contractor. Or you, if you hire directly, in which case a staffing provider or an employer of record handles the contract when the person is abroad.
The fit is narrower than the category admits: too early and the retainer goes unused, too late and it costs more than a hire.
A good engagement produces a diagnostic before it produces a forecast.
The most common stall is not the CFO: it is that the close is late, so the strategy arrives with stale numbers. Fix the layer underneath before or at the same time.
None of these disqualifies a provider on its own; all of them are questions for the first call.
Outsourced, fractional, part-time and virtual are mostly the same product sold under different labels. Two questions separate real options: how many hours a week, and is the person dedicated to us. Once you have those, convert the retainer to an effective hourly rate and compare it against the two alternatives nobody puts in the table, an in-house CFO and a dedicated finance lead hired nearshore.

See how we can help you find a perfect match in only 20 days. Interviewing candidates is free!
Book a Call
You can secure high-quality South American for around $9,000 USD per year. Interviewing candidates is completely free ofcharge.
You can secure high-quality South American talent in just 18 days and for around $9,000 USD per year.
Start Hiring